Leadership & Organization

Best Practices for Corporate Entrepreneurship – #2 External Connectivity/Customers

If you’ve been following the last few articles, the theme has been exploring the unique endeavor of “corporate entrepreneurship”, its challenges and what it takes to get it right (I encourage you to read the last few articles for context).

Based on deep experience in helping others & doing it ourselves, we’ve identified some key “best-practices” that are foundational to success. In the last article I highlighted the importance of “C-Suite Vision & Championing” (see previous article). This time we’ll zoom-in on another critical success-factor – the importance of “External Connectivity/Customers.”

Have you ever been in a large room with an echo? What are its characteristics? – high walls & ceilings, enclosed space, reverberating acoustics, etc. In many ways large organizations are exactly the same – …large population of employees, sharing the same culture, using similar vocabulary, discussing the same problems, coming up with similar ideas, etc. While there’s no question this comes with a lot of strengths, it’s obvious that when it comes to innovation, it can be challenging … even deadly!

Why? Since we know that innovation thrives on external inspiration, non-congruent thinking, challenging of paradigms and deep end-user insights…then listening to ourselves, group-think, and confirmation-bias are real threats that will happen unless we actively fight it.

External Network

How do we do that? Here are three success-factors that we’ve found to be critical in breaking out of the “internal echo-chamber”:

  • External customer-connections – it’s often surprising how few employees in large organizations have real direct interaction with customers (many times direct customer-interaction is farmed out to agencies or other third parties). It’s beyond “customer-contact,” it’s trying to share/feel the customer experience, targeting specific areas to understand it at a deeper behavioral level. Also, don’t overthink it. Start with the “users/customers” that are on your door-step with whom you can have direct contact (ex in your stores, in your personal network, those your salesforce talks to every day, etc.). You’ll be surprised how much you learn from just “walking a mile in their shoes” … doing what they do – in their homes, in their workplaces, their buying experiences, their recreational activities, their relationships, etc.
  • External networks – I once heard someone say – “in any given industry there’s about 200 people you have to know…and they know everyone else.” This is so true. Networks can be industry-specific (ex automotive, healthcare, financial, etc.), or subject-specific (ex big-data, sustainability, urban development, etc.). In both cases they provide excellent external stimulus, opportunities for analogous-exploration & thought-partnership, as well as insights to trends & latest breakthroughs (ex technology, startups, investment, etc.). Remember, it’s a “relationship-business,” so guard against the common pitfall of big organizations “who expect to only show up to a conference when they need something” (you’ll be disappointed). The key is to become part of these networks, regularly plant & water the seed of interaction/collaboration, attending gatherings & events, initiating & maintaining relationships, contributing and interacting…for the long-term.
  • External expertise – getting a different viewpoint can often be supported by including external experts in your internal initiatives. Beyond bringing skills & specialization you may not have, they can be used to demonstrate aspirational capabilities and provide a different perspective/angle. They’re allowed to ask the “dumb questions” or have the “wacky ideas” that often lead to different ways of thinking. A variety of categories of expertise come to mind – methodology/approach, technical, academic/pedagogical, human dynamics (teams, facilitation, etc.). Again, the significant advantage is that you’re allowing “external experts” to participate directly in “your work,” thereby benefiting from their direct interaction & impact, rubbing shoulders with your people, and mitigating the risk of internal re-filtering or distortion.

In summary, innovation thrives with stimulus that comes from outside of ourselves. It challenges established norms and creates new ways of thinking. If this is so vital for us as individuals, how much more for large organization whose natural tendencies are to become introverted & ingrown. Using the principles mentioned above, what will you do to fight to stay externally connected?

Picture: www.pexels.com

Links in the Chain of “Corporate-Entrepreneurship”

In the last post I mentioned the motivation for entrepreneurship-initiatives in a corporate environment (ex incubators, internal startups, “intrapreneurship,” etc.) and painted a picture of the overall challenge these efforts present. I used a few “parables” to make the challenge come to life and would now like to hone in on the specific (and unusual) image of the “speed-boat chained to the aircraft carrier” (you may need to take a moment to go back and read it) as a was to sharpen your understanding on the key points-of-tension between these two worlds.

In this parable there are a few key points to take to heart – first & foremost, if you’re doing entrepreneurial work inside of a corporate organization, you are on a chain (the corporate’s constraints) and can accelerate & maneuver only until the end of the chain before going the same speed as the aircraft carrier itself. Second, if the above is true, the following questions become absolutely essential to answer: how long is the chain?…what are the links in the chain (the constraints themselves)?…and how do you make it longer (more freedom to move)?

Selective Focus Photoraphy of Chains during Golden Hour

Based on our firsthand experience working and benchmarking with dozens of companies, here are the most common “links in the chain” (including constraints & pitfalls) that face most entrepreneurial teams in big organizations. I’ve organized them in three categories:

Culture & People

  • Hi-Risk & hi-reward (“lose everything…or make millions…”) – both of these are arguably the most powerful forces that drive & shape entrepreneurship in the real world. However, theses are also the most difficult to authentically replicate in large organizations (ex reward mechanisms, ownership, personal risk exposure, etc.).
  • Entrepreneurial profiles – it’s challenging to find these kinds of people in a corporate setting populated mostly with “sustainers” instead of starters (but they exist! – the challenge is finding them).
  • Risk-averse environment – in corporate cultures largely shaped by “right the first time,” “commitment to excellence,” and “protecting the brand”… tolerance for failure – the very thing needed to innovate – is limited.

Strategy & Management

  • Innovation strategy – limited direction on the avenues of growth and innovation beyond the core business. This lack of focus can make it extremely difficult to make necessary “bets” today for innovation activities that may only bear fruit the “day after tomorrow.”
  • Expectations – there is often a mis-match between the outcomes corporates expect versus the effort, time, resources, investment, number of ideas etc they’re willing to commit to make it happen. It’s the classic pipe-dream of picking “the one $100-million-idea” out of the stack of brainstormed-post-it-notes, dedicating 20% of a team’s time to build- & scale-up it up in the next 12 months. It ain’t gonna happen!
  • C-Level commitment – because entrepreneurial activities are so counter-cultural and require significant time to bear fruit, the level of “faith & protection to operate differently” cannot be under-estimated. This has to start at the C-suite-level and be vigorously sustained over time. Changes in leadership at this level make entrepreneurial efforts particularly vulnerable.

Process & Resources

  • Processes & metrics – an aircraft carrier & speedboat exist for different reasons, operate differently and should be measured differently. The same is true between the corporate- & entrepreneurial- worlds. Yet too often we find the entrepreneurial world having to operate under the same constraints & processes and being evaluated by the same metrics as the corporate world.
  • Time & speed – these are arguably the starkest “process-differentiators” when thinking about the previous point. Taking time to deliberate and perform deep analysis is a “must” for big organization (there’s too much at stake not to), whereas it can kill a startup whose life depends on sustaining momentum, taking action and “learning by doing…and failing.”
  • Resource-allocation – entrepreneurial efforts can often be a “side-show” in a corporate organization and suffer from “left-overs” – i.e. under-funding, 2nd rate talent, or half-hearted effort. The degree to which resources are committed to these activities can often make or break the success of entrepreneurial initiatives.

So, as you read through the list of “links in the chain”, think about how your corporate entity performs on each of these dimensions. Is it a “one-size-fits-all?” Does your organization recognize the difference, make provisions and “give you chain” to operate differently? How much? Try rating each link on a scale from 1-10 (mini-diagnostic). Understanding which chain-links are particularly problematic is a starting point for thinking about how to lengthen it…

…I’ll be back with best-practices that do exactly that!

Picture: www.pexels.com

What your Followers Want…in the Face of Fear

It’s stating the obvious that many of us are in a significant state of uncertainty, upheaval … and even crisis. Things change from day-to-day (or hour-to-hour), there are more questions then answers and the future is anything but clear.

Considering recent history, it’s certainly not the first time, nor will it be the last (…consider 2008 downturn, Great Depression, World Wars…). With ambiguity swirling and the inherent dynamics of a crisis, it’s impossible for leaders to have absolute answers on “the right solution.” However, in absence of clarity on “the what,” there’s pressing urgency on “the how” i.e. what followers need from their leaders.Linked in Followers

With this in mind I was inspired by a recent statement by Jim Clifton, Chairman & CEO of Gallup, as he reflected on some of their most significant research (Gallup is world leader in research & analytics):

“The world’s 7 billion citizens demand that leadership and institutions lead our nations and the world with (1) compassion, (2) stability, (3) trust, and (4) hope and inspiration for the future, according to our biggest global study of what followers want.”

While these powerful insights are certainly true of those mentioned in the statement (leaders of nations and the world), I’d like to resist the potential temptation to criticize or deflect this mandate only to the “the higher ups,” but rather challenge ourselves to think of our role as leaders – of companies, of teams, of families, of children, of friends…

What does it look like for you to:

  • …lead with compassion – letting others feel authentic empathy and that you’re there to help through word and action?
  • …lead with stability – despite the noise, providing calm and a steady hand within the storm?
  • …lead with trust – inspiring confidence that you are fighting for them, have their best interest in mind and will be truthful?
  • …lead with hope and inspiration for the future – encouraging, resisting negativity & passivity, pointing out the good wherever it is, and projecting unwavering faith that there is a brighter future ahead?

…as I recently did for an executive team…I challenge you to except the challenge, grab a pencil & paper, and think about what each one of these concretely looks like for your various leadership roles. You’ll be surprised what comes to mind…and remember, it’s not about your image or a nice-to-have PR-tactic…it’s “what your followers want!”

Picture: www.pexels.com